Comparing Arch Linux and Slackware (2025-08-14)

Dimension Arch Linux Slackware Linux
Latest stable Rolling (no versioned point release). 15.0 released Feb 2, 2022; active -current branch is updated continuously. (ArchWiki, slackware.com, mirrors.xmission.com)
Release model Rolling; you pacman -Syu to stay current. (ArchWiki) Fixed releases (e.g., 15.0) + -current (development) tree. (mirrors.xmission.com)
Architectures Officially x86-64 only; i686 support ended Nov 2017. (ArchWiki, Arch Linux) x86-64 and IA-32 (32-bit) builds; official ARM/AArch64 port exists (Slackware ARM). (slackware.com, It’s FOSS)
Minimum CPU/RAM (installable OS) Arch supports x86-64 only and the official guide notes ≥512 MiB RAM (more for a comfortable install/DE). (ArchWiki) Slackware’s classic sys-req page lists 486 CPU, 64 MB RAM (historic, very conservative). In practice for Slackware 15.x: x86-64 CPU for 64-bit; ~1 GB RAM is a sane floor for a usable desktop. (slackware.com, mirrors.xmission.com)
Kernel policy Tracks latest stable kernel in the linux package (optional linux-lts). (ArchWiki) Ships huge (installer/emergency) and generic kernels; generic is recommended with an initrd. 15.0 included Linux 5.15.19. (mirrors.xmission.com)
Init (PID 1) & services systemd; manage with systemctl. (ArchWiki) sysvinit with BSD-style rc scripts in /etc/rc.d (no systemd). (Reddit)
Initramfs tool mkinitcpio by default (Dracut also available). (GitHub) mkinitrd (documented in tree). (mirrors.xmission.com)
Boot on ISO / Secure Boot Arch install medium uses systemd-boot (UEFI) and Syslinux (BIOS); Secure Boot not supported on the official ISO. (ArchWiki) Installer/configs cover UEFI; Slackware recommends ELILO for UEFI, LILO for BIOS (GRUB possible). Typically disable Secure Boot.
Installer Live ISO + guided archinstall (or manual). Very flexible. (slackware.com) Text-mode ncurses setup with series selection; traditional and predictable. Official HOWTO/README guide the flow. (mirrors.xmission.com)
Default desktop None preselected; pick anything (Plasma, GNOME, Xfce, tiling WMs, etc.). Full desktops included on media (e.g., KDE Plasma, Xfce in 15.0) but you still choose what to install. (mirrors.xmission.com)
Package manager pacman (.pkg.tar.zst), with automatic dependency resolution; build via PKGBUILD/makepkg. (Reddit) pkgtools (installpkg, upgradepkg, removepkg; interactive pkgtool) and slackpkg for mirror updates; no automatic dep-res by design (third-party tools like slpkg/slapt-get exist). (docs.slackware.com, slackpkg.org, [Akamai](https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/slackware-package-management/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "How to Manage Packages in Slackware
Community packages AUR (huge user-build repo; PKGBUILDs reviewed by users / TUs). (Jeremy Morgan) SlackBuilds.org provides vetted build scripts for third-party software. (Wikipedia)
Update workflow pacman -Syu (read Arch News when hooks require manual steps). slackpkg update; slackpkg upgrade-all against your chosen Slackware mirror. (docs.slackware.com)
Networking You choose: NetworkManager, systemd-networkd, etc. Classic /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.conf scripts (now iproute2-based), with NetworkManager available if you prefer. (mirrors.xmission.com)
PAM / auth PAM standard (via systemd stack). PAM now shipped by Slackware (since 15 series/dev cycle). (mirrors.xmission.com)
Documentation ArchWiki: famously comprehensive and extremely active; hundreds of active editors in the last 30 days. (ArchWiki) SlackDocs + the Slackware Book; active but smaller footprint; many users rely on forum READMEs and AlienBOB posts too. (docs.slackware.com)
Community size (rough signals) Very large subreddit & forum; constant wiki churn and new content. (Reddit, ArchWiki) Smaller, tight-knit community centered on LinuxQuestions’ Slackware forum, SlackDocs, and core dev blogs. (docs.slackware.com)
Configuration philosophy Minimal base + compose your system; modern defaults (systemd, Wayland-friendly). As Unix-like as possible; ships closer to upstream, favors simplicity and admin control (you run the rc scripts, pick bootloader, etc.). (Wikipedia)
Who it’s best for Users who want a current stack, fast access to new software, and are comfortable reading/maintaining configs. Users who value stability with control, classic Unix feel, and predictable, transparent shell-scripted init.

Practical minimum hardware (my take, with sources and realistic caveats)

  • Arch: You need x86-64 and ≥512 MiB RAM to bootstrap from the ISO; realistically 1–2 GiB for a smooth CLI install and ≥4 GiB for a mainstream desktop. (ArchWiki)

  • Slackware: The historical page says 486 / 64 MB (this predates 15.x); 64-bit Slackware obviously needs x86-64. In practice, plan on ~1 GiB for a light desktop (Xfce), and more for a full Plasma session. (slackware.com, mirrors.xmission.com)

Nuances that matter

  • Init & services: Arch’s systemd brings unified logging, timers, cgroups, and a consistent service model. Slackware’s rc scripts are transparent and easy to audit; fewer moving parts, but less built-in orchestration. (ArchWiki, Reddit)

  • Booting: Arch’s ISO uses systemd-boot/Syslinux; Slackware’s docs steer UEFI installs toward ELILO, with LILO for legacy BIOS (GRUB fully viable on both). Secure Boot generally off on Slackware; Arch’s ISO doesn’t support SB. (ArchWiki)

  • Packaging ecosystems: Arch’s AUR is massive and fast-moving; Slackware’s SBo is smaller but curated. Slackware’s official tooling intentionally does not resolve deps—many admins prefer the explicitness. (Jeremy Morgan, Wikipedia, docs.slackware.com)

  • Networking defaults: Slackware’s rc.inet1 now uses iproute2; IPv6 SLAAC default is off (you opt in). Arch leaves you to pick NM/systemd-networkd/iwd/etc. (mirrors.xmission.com)

  • Kernels: Slackware ships huge (catch-all) vs generic (paired with initrd); Slackware explicitly recommends generic+initrd for daily use. Arch tracks latest stable and makes LTS easy to switch to. (mirrors.xmission.com)